Part III — GCPN Container Schema: Research Gain from the First Signature Transaction
Trigger S6 (The first real transaction): The series documented the procedures in Parts I/II — then came the first real signature transaction: a shareholders' meeting resolution (placeholder
shareholder-meeting-resolution, anonymized) was executed with facsimile signing and a complete chain. The insights gained in the process (research gain) flow into a normative JSON schema:gcpn-container-1.0.
Overview of the Articles (DS12–DS15)
| Art. | Title (DE) | Core Question |
|---|---|---|
| DS12 | The Schema gcpn-container-1.0 — Overview |
How is the container normatively structured, without internal redundancy? |
| DS13 | Referenced-Doc, Actor, Attendees, Persons | Who is who — act of the shareholders vs. attendees vs. PII bridge? |
| DS14 | Events as Flags Enum and events_result |
How do bits express the steps traversed? |
| DS15 | The Act as State Transition — Protocol Interpretation | What does an "Act" between two states mean — and GVB as protocol? |
The Insights at a Glance (Research Gain)
Four insights from the first transaction flowed into the schema — each one is an AP insight for the research report (BSFZ/FZul project GitCover.IdP):
- Artifact Uniqueness (DS12): Each entity (
referenced_doc,actor,retention) is described exactly once; further references are sha256-based or run viaactor_ref— internal redundancy and repo bloat (standalone.jsonfiles) are avoided. - Role Layering (DS13): The Actor is the act of the
shareholders (the meeting/sole shareholder —
shareholder-meeting-resolution), the Attendee is the person as participant (MD, signing);personsforms the pseudonymized PII bridge (canonical mapping in the gitignored PII circle). - Flags Semantics (DS14): The event steps (
offered/accepted/denied/ sign/withdraw) are bits (1/2/4/8/16), theevents_resultis the bitmask of the steps traversed (e.g., 11 = offered + accepted + sign) — deterministically verifiable, no free text. - Protocol/State Interpretation (DS15): The GVB is the protocol, the Acts are the resolutions; an Act describes the change between two states (before → after) — the GCPN documents exactly these state transitions in a revision-safe manner (Git history = chronology).
Connection to Parts I/II
Parts I/II describe the procedure (How do you sign?); Part III distills the Model from it (How do you describe the procedure in a machine-readable way?). The series thus follows the GCBoK principle: procedure (Saga) → insight (research gain) → schema (normative).
Next: Part IV — PII, GPG & Governikus (planned).
Created: 260913 | Part III of the digital-signage series