ED06 - Documents, DMS, e-invoices: Order, retrograde/progressive traceability

Problem

An entrepreneur starts filing documents - and faces the question: How do I organize documents in a GoBD-compliant way, and how do I make them traceable?

Current practice in the SME sector:

Core statement

GoBD-compliant document filing means:

  1. Every document has a unique identity (DocID) - the uuidV7 (Object ID) is already by itself the unique identity of the document, regardless of the file name. In addition, every document receives a SHA-256 hash as a cryptographic integrity check. The Composite Key V7GUID:uuidV7 serves the filing organization (e.g. by document type) and DB queries (e.g. with EF Core in a Vertical App) - not the identity itself.
  2. Every document has a sidecar - .v7g.md with classification (V7GUID), object identity (uuidV7), taxonomy, obsolescence status, capture time (in uuidV7 as a 48-bit timestamp)
  3. Every booking entry references its document - source_sha256 in the journal entry → document
  4. Retrograde traceability - resolvable from the booking entry → document → journal entry → uuidV7
  5. Progressive traceability - resolvable from the document → booking entry → Grundbuch → opening balance sheet
  6. e-invoice: XML is the original document - not the PDF (since 2025, § 14 UStG, EN 16931)

Compliance by Design: Document order does not arise from retrospective sorting, but from structural mandatory fields (SHA-256, V7GUID, sidecar) and pre-commit hooks that check every booking entry for a document reference.

Document types and their GoBD specifics

%%{init: {'theme':'base','themeVariables':{'primaryColor':'#FBFAF7','primaryTextColor':'#0F1B33','primaryBorderColor':'#6B7280','lineColor':'#6B7280'}}}%% flowchart TD B["Document"] B --> P["Paper document
(scan required)"] B --> PDF["PDF document
(other invoice)"] B --> EML["Email
(EML + attachment)"] B --> XML["e-invoice
(XML - original document)"] P --> S["Scan → SHA-256
+ sidecar"] PDF --> SH["SHA-256
+ sidecar"] EML --> EM["EML archived
+ attachment extracted
+ sidecar"] XML --> XV["XML unchanged
+ sidecar
+ validation (EN 16931)"] style B fill:#0F1B33,stroke:#0F1B33,color:#FBFAF7 style P fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style PDF fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style EML fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style XML fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style S fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33 style SH fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33 style EM fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33 style XV fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33
Document type GoBD specifics Retention period
Paper document Scan required (§ 147 Abs. 2 AO); the original may be destroyed if the scan is GoBD-compliant 8 years (§ 147 Abs. 3 AO)
PDF document ("other invoice") Since 2025 no longer an "e-invoice"; SHA-256 + sidecar; machine-evaluable? No - the PDF is unstructured 8 years
Email (EML + attachment) An email inbox is not an archive; the EML must be archived together with the attachment; sender verification 6 years (§ 147 Abs. 1 Nr. 2/3 AO)
e-invoice (XML) XML is the original document (since 2025, § 14 UStG); retain unchanged; EN 16931 validation; machine-evaluable 8 years

Important - e-invoice since 2025: Since 1 January 2025, the e-invoice is mandatory for B2B transactions between domestic companies (§ 14 UStG). A simple PDF is no longer an e-invoice - it is an "other invoice". An e-invoice is only present if it is issued, transmitted and received in a structured electronic format (XML, EN 16931). See ED01 "e-invoice: XML formats are original documents under the AO".

Document classification in the Git repo

Directory structure

ORG-1/sources/                    # document archive (Tenant: ORG-1)
├── eingangsrechnungen/           # incoming invoices (suppliers)
│   ├── 260815/                   # by date (YYMMDD)
│   │   ├── rechnung_001.xml      # e-invoice (XRechnung)
│   │   ├── rechnung_001.xml.v7g.md  # sidecar
│   │   └── rechnung_002.pdf      # other invoice (PDF)
│   │   └── rechnung_002.pdf.v7g.md  # sidecar
├── ausgangsrechnungen/           # outgoing invoices (customers)
├── lohnbelege/                   # payroll statements
├── sv-bescheide/                 # SV notices, VBG notices
├── vertraege/                    # contracts (cross-period)
├── korrespondenz/                # emails, letters
└── sonstige/                     # other documents

Sidecar per document (mandatory)

Every document receives a .v7g.md sidecar with the Composite Key V7GUID:uuidV7:

{
  "$schema": "https://gitcover.org/schemas/v7g-sidecar-1.0.schema.json",
  "V7GUID": "<V7GUID-Class-from-Registry>",
  "uuidV7": "019f2c6f-0900-7001-8000-000000000001",
  "sha256": "ab94670c0dd8499c27ef2feddd1d9c5925977d55a52150a6fca0f6567d2e5e79",
  "title": "260815_Rechnung_001.xml",
  "original_filename": "Rechnung_001.xml",
  "locations": [
    {
      "unc_path": "./ORG-1/sources/eingangsrechnungen/260815/rechnung_001.xml",
      "from": "260815",
      "to": null,
      "note": "Primary storage location"
    }
  ],
  "v7g_taxonomy": [
    {
      "v7guid": "019f2c6f-0900-7000-8000-000000000000",
      "taxonomy": "ORG-1/Eingangsrechnung",
      "valid_from": "260815",
      "valid_to": null,
      "note": "Tenant: ORG-1, Category: Eingangsrechnung, Sphere: economic"
    }
  ],
  "gcpn": {
    "prima_nota_ref": "GB-2026-08-001",
    "journal_entry_ref": "J-2026-08-001"
  },
  "obsolescence": {
    "status": "active",
    "superseded_by": null,
    "superseded_at": null
  }
}

Composite Key V7GUID:uuidV7 - filing organization and query:

  • uuidV7 (Object ID) - is already by itself the unique identity (DocID) of the document, generated with a preset timestamp, 48-bit timestamp anchored in the GUID
  • V7GUID (Class) - classifies the document type from the .gitcover registry (document type, filing organization, DB query in a Vertical App with EF Core)
  • v7g_taxonomy[].v7guid - Object ID of the classified document
  • gcpn.prima_nota_ref / journal_entry_ref - cross-reference to Grundbuch/journal (progressive traceability)
  • The Composite Key V7GUID:uuidV7 serves filing organization and query - the identity of the document is the uuidV7 alone
  • No separate datetime field - the time is embedded in uuidV7

Retrograde and progressive traceability

%%{init: {'theme':'base','themeVariables':{'primaryColor':'#FBFAF7','primaryTextColor':'#0F1B33','primaryBorderColor':'#6B7280','lineColor':'#6B7280'}}}%% flowchart LR subgraph RET["Retrograde (auditor from the booking entry backwards)"] direction LR BS["Booking entry
SKR04 6000 to 1600"] BS --> SR["source_sha256
in the journal entry"] SR --> BE["Document
(SHA-256 match)"] BE --> SC["Sidecar .v7g.md
V7GUID:uuidV7"] SC --> DE["Journal entry
uuidV7"] end subgraph PRO["Progressive (auditor from the document forwards)"] direction LR BE2["Document
(SHA-256)"] BE2 --> SC2["Sidecar .v7g.md
gcpn.journal_entry_ref"] SC2 --> BS2["Booking entry
SKR04"] BS2 --> GB["Grundbuch
(JSON)"] GB --> EB["Opening balance sheet"] end style BS fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style SR fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style BE fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style SC fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33 style DE fill:#0F1B33,stroke:#0F1B33,color:#FBFAF7 style BE2 fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style SC2 fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33 style BS2 fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style GB fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style EB fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33
Direction Start Resolution via Target GoBD reference
Retrograde Booking entry (SKR04) source_sha256 → document → sidecar uuidV7 Journal entry Rz. 146 (comprehensibility)
Progressive Document (SHA-256) sidecar gcpn.journal_entry_ref → booking entry → Grundbuch Opening balance sheet Rz. 147 (verifiability)

GoBD reference: Retrograde traceability corresponds to GoBD Rz. 146 (comprehensibility - "expert third party within a reasonable time"). Progressive traceability corresponds to GoBD Rz. 147 (verifiability). Both are guaranteed by design through SHA-256 + V7GUID + sidecar - not through manual cross-references.

e-invoice: XML is the original document

%%{init: {'theme':'base','themeVariables':{'primaryColor':'#FBFAF7','primaryTextColor':'#0F1B33','primaryBorderColor':'#6B7280','lineColor':'#6B7280'}}}%% flowchart TD ER["e-invoice received
(XML or ZUGFeRD)"] ER --> V["Validation
EN 16931 / XRechnung schema"] V -->|valid| A["Filing in the Git repo
XML unchanged"] V -->|invalid| R["Error logging
+ manual review"] A --> S["Sidecar .v7g.md
SHA-256 + V7GUID:uuidV7"] S --> B["Booking entry
source_sha256 → XML"] B --> N["Traceability
retrograde + progressive"] style ER fill:#0F1B33,stroke:#0F1B33,color:#FBFAF7 style V fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style A fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33 style R fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style S fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33 style B fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style N fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33

XRechnung vs. ZUGFeRD

Format Structure Original document Visualization
XRechnung Pure XML (EN 16931) XML file XML viewer required (e.g. ELSTER (e-rechnung.elster.de)[https://e-rechnung.elster.de]
ZUGFeRD Hybrid: PDF + embedded XML XML part (authoritative since 2025, BMF FAQ 12a) PDF image (auxiliary display only)

Important - ZUGFeRD since 2025: In the event of discrepancies between the XML part and the PDF image part, the structured (XML) part is authoritative since 2025 (BMF FAQ question 12a). The PDF image is no longer the leading version. The sidecar must reference the XML as the original document, not the PDF.

Pre-commit hook for e-invoices

For e-invoices, the pre-commit hook checks:

Check Error if
XML file has valid XRechnung/ZUGFeRD structure Invalid XML structure
Sidecar .v7g.md present Missing sidecar
sha256 in the sidecar matches the XML file Hash mismatch (file modified)
v7g_taxonomy classifies as e-invoice Missing classification
No datetime/date field in the sidecar (time in uuidV7) Redundant field

Email archiving

Emails are commercial or business letters within the meaning of § 147 Abs. 1 Nr. 2/3 AO and must therefore be retained for 6 years. Many entrepreneurs do not archive emails - this is a GoBD violation.

%%{init: {'theme':'base','themeVariables':{'primaryColor':'#FBFAF7','primaryTextColor':'#0F1B33','primaryBorderColor':'#6B7280','lineColor':'#6B7280'}}}%% flowchart LR EM["Email received
(EML/MBOX)"] EM --> EX["Attachment extracted
(PDF, XML)"] EM --> AR["EML archived
(unchanged)"] EX --> SH["SHA-256 per attachment"] AR --> SH2["SHA-256 of the EML"] SH --> SC["Sidecar .v7g.md
per document"] SH2 --> SC2["Sidecar .v7g.md
for the email"] style EM fill:#0F1B33,stroke:#0F1B33,color:#FBFAF7 style EX fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style AR fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style SH fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style SH2 fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style SC fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33 style SC2 fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33
Step Action GoBD reference
Email received Store the EML file unchanged § 147 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 AO (commercial letters received)
Extract attachment Store the PDF/XML attachment separately + SHA-256 Machine evaluability (§ 147 Abs. 6 AO)
Sidecar per document .v7g.md for the EML and for each attachment Comprehensibility (Rz. 146)
Sender verification DKIM/SPF headers documented in the sidecar Evidentiary value of the email

Practical tip: A Git repo can archive emails (EML/MBOX) and attachments (PDF, XML) in parallel - with a clear separation by document type in the sidecar (v7g_taxonomy). The pre-commit hook checks that every EML has a sidecar and that every attachment is classified separately.

Document completeness (pre-commit hook)

%%{init: {'theme':'base','themeVariables':{'primaryColor':'#FBFAF7','primaryTextColor':'#0F1B33','primaryBorderColor':'#6B7280','lineColor':'#6B7280'}}}%% flowchart TD C["Commit with booking entry"] C --> H["Pre-commit hook"] H --> P1{"source_sha256
present?"} P1 -->|no| R1["Commit rejected
document reference missing"] P1 -->|yes| P2{"Document exists
in the repo?"} P2 -->|no| R2["Commit rejected
document not found"] P2 -->|yes| P3{"Sidecar .v7g.md
present?"} P3 -->|no| R3["Commit rejected
sidecar missing"] P3 -->|yes| P4{"SHA-256 match?"} P4 -->|no| R4["Commit rejected
document modified"] P4 -->|yes| OK["Commit accepted
document completeness OK"] style C fill:#0F1B33,stroke:#0F1B33,color:#FBFAF7 style H fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style P1 fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style P2 fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style P3 fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style P4 fill:#DBEAFE,stroke:#1D4ED8,color:#0F1B33 style R1 fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style R2 fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style R3 fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style R4 fill:#FDBA74,stroke:#C2410C,color:#0F1B33 style OK fill:#D1FAE5,stroke:#0A7F5C,color:#0F1B33
Check Error if GoBD reference
source_sha256 present Missing document reference Rz. 146 (comprehensibility)
Document exists in the repo Document not archived § 147 Abs. 1 Nr. 4 AO (booking document)
Sidecar present Missing classification Rz. 146 (comprehensibility)
SHA-256 match Document modified afterwards Rz. 146 (immutability)

Risk leverage

Today (cheap) Tomorrow (audit-proof) Risk mitigated
SHA-256 per document Unique document ID, independent of the file name Dispute of document authenticity
Sidecar with Composite Key V7GUID:uuidV7 Classification act comprehensible Dispute of the classification
source_sha256 per booking entry Retrograde traceability Dispute of the document assignment
gcpn.journal_entry_ref in the sidecar Progressive traceability Dispute of the booking
e-invoice XML unchanged + sidecar Compliant with § 14b UStG (integrity) Non-deductibility of input tax
Email EML archived + sidecar Compliant with § 147 Abs. 1 Nr. 2 AO Loss of evidence in disputes with authorities
Pre-commit hook checks document completeness No booking entry without a document GoBD violation "not complete"

Harness requirement (preview)

Derivable from ED06:

ID Requirement Priority
FA-2.1 SHA-256 as document ID MUST
FA-2.2 .v7g.md sidecar mandatory per document MUST
FA-2.3 Sidecar with Composite Key V7GUID:uuidV7 MUST
FA-2.8 DMS functionality: document classification MUST
FA-2.9 e-invoice integration: XRechnung/ZUGFeRD import, validation SHOULD
FA-2.10 Email archiving: EML + SHA-256 + sidecar MUST
FA-2.11 GoBD order: index per fiscal year MUST
FA-2.12 Retrograde traceability MUST
FA-2.13 Progressive traceability MUST
FA-2.14 Pre-commit hook: check document completeness MUST
FA-2.15 Scan workflow: paper → scan → SHA-256 → sidecar SHOULD

The complete list of requirements in Harness-Anforderungen.md.

Sources

Role Location Purpose
Primary / SSoT git.gitcover.org/GCC Canonical storage (GPG-signed, versioned)
Public OSS Mirror / CDN codeberg.org/gitcover-commons Read-only mirror; FLOSS discovery
Community Hub github.com/gitcover-commons Issues & Discussions; source code reference on Codeberg

Note: This mapping of sources, mirror, and community hub reflects the current state and may change. Please check the respective canonical source on gitcover.org for the current state.